OBS output
1080p60 full-frame recording. Delivery used a manual Google Drive upload.
Loom works through Chrome on Linux, but there is no native Linux desktop app. In three runs on one Ubuntu 26.04 setup, Screenix Instant reached a share page in an 8.23-second median after Stop, compared with 22.34 seconds for our OBS plus Google Drive workflow.
Why Screenix is the better value
Record, polish, edit, transcribe, and share without stacking separate tools or giving up local ownership.
Native Linux
Direct X11 and portal-based capture on supported Wayland desktops
One complete workflow
Record, polish, edit, transcribe, and share
Your files, your choice
Keep recordings local, use hosted sharing, or bring your own storage
Simple pricing
$39/yr with hosted sharing or $59 lifetime with your own storage
Three one-minute tests on Ubuntu 26.04: Screenix reached a share page in an 8.23s median; OBS plus manual Google Drive sharing took 22.34s. The videos are separate prepared takes showing output only.
1080p60 full-frame recording. Delivery used a manual Google Drive upload.
1080p60 with four automatic 1.5x zooms driven by recorded clicks and cursor movement.
Stop to recipient-ready link
Three founder-timed runs per workflow.
Screenix
5.75–9.78s, median 8.23s
OBS + Google Drive
20.25–34.36s, median 22.34s
Post-stop delivery
Google Drive was the real manual delivery path tested.
Screenix
Automatic hosted share page
OBS + Google Drive
Find, upload, change access, copy link
Prepared output treatment
These two prepared takes demonstrate output only, not timing.
Screenix
Four auto-zooms with recorded cursor data
OBS + Google Drive
Unenhanced full-frame capture
Tested on Ubuntu 26.04 with GNOME Wayland, an Intel Core i9-9900K, an NVIDIA RTX 2060, current Screenix source version 1.6.10, and OBS Studio 32.2.0. The Screenix MP4 does not embed the running app version. Timing started when Stop was pressed and ended when a link opened without authentication. Screenix used its integrated hosted path; OBS used the founder's manual Google Drive path.
This compares two complete delivery workflows on one machine and network, not raw encoder performance or every possible OBS sharing setup. The runs used founder stopwatch observations, output bitrates were not matched, and Loom itself was not timed. An automated sync folder, plugin, or different storage provider could shorten the OBS delivery path.
Try Screenix for 7 days with no credit card. Instant shares have no watermark.
Create and share one 60-second updateFinish a recording and turn it into a shareable link without leaving Screenix. It is the fast async workflow people expect from Loom, built directly for Linux.
Choose your instant recording behavior, sharing defaults, and storage setup directly inside Screenix before you start recording.
See why Linux creators choose Screenix for polished recordings.
A practical breakdown for Linux recording workflows.
Loom's Chrome experience is useful for quick cloud messages, but it does not provide the same desktop integration or local project workflow as a native Linux recorder.
Screenix is built as a native Linux application, not ported or wrapped. It integrates directly with your display server and gives you full control over your recordings.
Three reasons developers and creators choose Screenix
Screenix is built specifically for Linux and installs through a native .deb on Ubuntu, an RPM on Fedora, or the AUR on Arch without needing a Chrome extension or a browser.
Loom organizes recordings in cloud workspaces. Screenix keeps original projects local and uploads a video only when you choose instant sharing, hosted sharing, or your own R2/S3 storage.
Loom focuses on async messaging. Screenix records click data, generates smooth zooms in the editor, and lets you adjust the result before export.
Screenix runs natively on Ubuntu, Fedora, Debian, Arch, Manjaro, Linux Mint, and CachyOS, no Wine, no workarounds, just native performance.
Native Linux App
8GB RAM minimum
Local recording and editing
Everything you need to know about Screenix and Loom